How AI Leaders Are Building Safer Agentic Systems

Peter Bubenik · Nvidia Research · · Source
Image for AI Leaders Propose SAFE Guidelines for Cybersecurity Transparency

Step-by-Step Study Guide

Step 1: Understanding the Problem — Why AI Cybersecurity Needs New Approaches

The Core Challenge

Traditional cybersecurity was built for static software. Agentic AI systems are fundamentally different because:

Traditional SoftwareAgentic AI Systems
Executes fixed instructionsMakes autonomous decisions
Predictable behaviorDynamic, adaptive behavior
Limited attack surfaceExpanded attack surface
Reactive responses acceptableMust respond at agent speed

Key Concept: Attack Surface Expansion

Every major technology shift creates new potential attack surfaces

What this means practically:

  • An AI agent can access tools, databases, and external systems
  • It can be manipulated through prompt injection (tricking the agent with malicious instructions)
  • It can be compromised through tools poisoning (corrupting the tools the agent uses)
  • Vulnerabilities can cascade across interconnected agent systems

✅ Check Your Understanding

Can you explain why securing an AI agent requires more than traditional vulnerability scanning?


Step 2: The SAFE Framework — Collective Defense as a Strategy

What is SAFE?

SAFE = Shared AI Findings Exchange

Think of it like a neighborhood watch program, but for AI cybersecurity:

Individual Organization                 Entire Ecosystem
Experiences AI incident    →    Reports confidentially    →    Everyone benefits
Discovers near-miss        →    Shares findings           →    Systemic risks reduced
Identifies control failure →    Publishes recommendations →    Collective defense strengthened

The Four Pillars of SAFE

1. Confidential Collection

  • Organizations report AI incidents and near-misses safely
  • Encourages honest reporting without fear of public exposure

2. Informed Notification

  • Those impacted by threats are alerted promptly
  • Reduces harm from known vulnerabilities

3. Pattern Recognition

  • Identifies recurring control failures across organizations
  • Moves defense from reactive to proactive

4. Evidence-Based Recommendations

  • Publishes operating guidelines grounded in real incidents
  • Reduces systemic risk across the entire ecosystem

Why Collective Defense Matters

"When trusted ecosystems share threat intelligence openly, collective defense becomes a force multiplier"

Force multiplier means: one shared discovery protects hundreds of organizations simultaneously, rather than each organization learning the same lesson independently through costly incidents.

✅ Check Your Understanding

Why would an organization benefit from sharing its own security incidents with competitors?


Step 3: The AI Security Stack — Layers of Defense

Core Concept: Layered Security

Security is strongest when built in multiple overlapping layers. Think of it like a castle:

🏰 CASTLE ANALOGY → AI SECURITY STACK

Moat          = Identity & Permissions (Who gets access?)
Drawbridge    = Harnesses & Tooling (How is access controlled?)
Guards        = Runtime Guardrails (What can agents do in real time?)
Watchtowers   = Observability & Evaluation (What are agents doing?)
Emergency Plan = Availability & Resilience (What happens when things fail?)

Layer 1: Identity and Permissions

Core Question: Who gets to act?

"You can't secure what you can't identify"

Key tools and concepts:

ToolOrganizationFunction
Cross App Access (XAA)OktaOpen protocol for agent identity in enterprise apps
Agent Guard / Agent WatchPalo Alto NetworksIdentity security best practices for agents
asagoRed HatMaps governance requirements (NIST, OWASP, EU AI Act) to runtime controls

Why this matters: Without identity controls, any agent could access any resource. Identity layers ensure:

  • Only authorized agents perform specific actions
  • Every action is traceable to a specific agent identity
  • Governance policies (like EU AI Act requirements) are automatically enforced

Layer 2: Harnesses and Tooling

Core Question: How does security work get orchestrated?

Critical Distinction to Understand:

MODEL = The agent's "brain" (reasoning and decision-making)
HARNESS = The agent's "body" (takes action using tools)

The harness acts as an orchestrator that:

  • Deploys agents
  • Coordinates multiple agents working together
  • Constrains what agents are permitted to do

Key tools:

ToolOrganizationFunction
Strands AgentsAmazonOpen source toolkit with full visibility into agent behavior
CedarAmazonAuthorization language enforcing verifiable boundaries
VulnHunterCapital OneAgentic AI code security
PyRITMicrosoftAutomated AI red teaming toolkit
RAMPARTMicrosoftConverts red-team findings into repeatable tests
AtlasWizAutonomous vulnerability research engine

Red Teaming Explained: Red teaming means deliberately attacking your own systems to find weaknesses before real attackers do. Tools like PyRIT automate this process for AI systems.


Layer 3: Models Built for Security

Core Question: What intelligence powers the defense?

Not all AI models are equal for security tasks. Specialized security models are:

  • Trained specifically on security data
  • Optimized to understand code and vulnerabilities
  • More efficient than general-purpose models for defense tasks

Example — CrowdStrike + NVIDIA Nemotron:

  • Fine-tuned specifically for cyber defense
  • Achieved 96% accuracy generating investigation queries
  • Outperforms much larger general models on Security Operations Center tasks
  • Uses confidence scoring to make autonomous decisions auditable

Key concept: Confidence Scoring When an AI agent makes a security decision autonomously, defenders need to know how certain the model was. Logit-based confidence scoring provides a measurable, tunable confidence level — making AI decisions auditable rather than opaque.


Layer 4: Observability and Evaluation

Core Question: What did agents do, and why?

Seeing what an agent did is only part of the picture. Defenders need to understand:

  • What action was taken
  • Why the agent took it
  • Whether the behavior was safe
  • How attacks are evolving

Key tools:

ToolOrganizationFunction
NumbatPerplexityDetects and records agent activity across operating systems
ADRUberReconstructs full causal chain from prompt → reasoning → tool calls → outcomes
Cognition EvaluationCognitionMeasures alignment and security risks of open source models

Uber ADR in Practice:

Agent receives prompt
        ↓
Agent reasons about response
        ↓
Agent calls tools/APIs
        ↓
Outcome is produced
        ↓
ADR records and analyzes EVERY step
(200,000+ sessions/day across 30,000 endpoints)

This causal chain reconstruction allows security teams to understand exactly how a threat developed, not just that it occurred.


Layer 5: Availability and Resilience

Core Question: What happens when things go wrong?

Agent systems must:

  • Remain dependable under disruption
  • Contain failures so they don't spread
  • Recover safely without losing critical state

Key tools:

ToolOrganizationCapability
LangChain/LangGraphLangChainRetry interrupted work, resume from saved state, fall back to alternative models
KanisterVeeamProtect and recover AI workloads and vector databases to verified known-good state

Why "known-good state" matters: If an AI system is compromised, you need to restore it to a verified clean state — not just any previous state that might also have been compromised.


Step 4: NVIDIA's Full-Stack Contribution — A Case Study

NVIDIA's contributions illustrate how a complete security stack works together:

RESEARCH & TESTING
└── NOOA (Object-Oriented Agent harness) — test, trace, audit agent behavior

RUNTIME CONTROL
└── OpenShell — restricts what agents can see, touch, and do

OPEN MODELS (with open weights, datasets, training techniques)
├── Nemotron — agentic AI
├── Cosmos — physical AI
├── Isaac GR00T — robotics
├── BioNeMo — healthcare
└── Alpamayo — autonomous vehicles

CAPABILITY LAYER
└── Verified Agent Skills — cataloged, scanned, cryptographically signed, documented

SAFETY & PRIVACY
├── NeMo Guardrails — enforce safety policies
├── NeMo Anonymizer — protect sensitive data
└── NeMo Safe Synthesizer — generate privacy-safe synthetic data

VULNERABILITY SCANNING
└── Garak — scans for data leaks, prompt injections, jailbreaks

Key Concept: Cryptographic Signing of Agent Skills

Each agent skill is:

  1. Cataloged — documented and tracked
  2. Scanned — checked for prompt injection and tools poisoning risks
  3. Cryptographically signed — any modification after publication is detectable
  4. Documented with a skill card — defenders know exactly what it does and where it came from

This creates a chain of trust from creation to deployment.


Step 5: The Open Source Principle — Why Openness Strengthens Security

A Common Misconception

Many assume: "If security tools are open source, attackers can study them too — isn't that dangerous?"

The Reality

Open source security tools are stronger because:

Open Source AdvantageExplanation
InspectabilityAnyone can verify the tool does what it claims
Community improvementThousands of defenders can find and fix flaws
Shared mitigationsOne organization's fix protects everyone
AuditabilityGovernance requirements can be verified
SpeedDefenders adapt faster when they can see and modify tools

"When members publish reusable mitigations, defenders across the ecosystem can inspect, adapt and improve them"


Summary: Connecting All Concepts

THREAT LANDSCAPE
(New AI attack surfaces: prompt injection, tools poisoning, agent manipulation)
        ↓
COLLECTIVE RESPONSE
(SAFE Framework: share incidents, identify patterns, publish recommendations)
        ↓
LAYERED DEFENSE STACK
├── Identity & Permissions → Control WHO acts
├── Harnesses & Tooling → Control HOW agents act
├── Specialized Models → Intelligent defense at scale
├── Observability → Understand WHAT and WHY
└── Resilience → Recover WHEN things fail
        ↓
OPEN SOURCE ECOSYSTEM
(120+ organizations sharing tools, findings, and improvements)
        ↓
COLLECTIVE DEFENSE AS FORCE MULTIPLIER

Final Knowledge Check

Test yourself with these questions:

  1. What does SAFE stand for, and what are its four core functions?

  2. Explain the difference between a model and a harness in an agentic AI system.

  3. Why is cryptographic signing of agent skills important for security?

  4. What is prompt injection, and at which layer of the security stack is it primarily addressed?

  5. How does the SAFE framework turn one organization's incident into protection for the entire ecosystem?

  6. Why might a specialized small language model outperform a much larger general model for security tasks?

  7. What does "causal chain reconstruction" mean, and why is it valuable for security teams?


Mastering these concepts gives you a comprehensive understanding of how modern AI security frameworks operate — from individual tool design to ecosystem-wide collaborative defense strategies.

More to study