Imagine reading a book where every sentence is translated in isolation, with no memory of what came before.
Example in English:
"John walked in. He sat down. He looked tired."
A sentence-level system would not know who "He" refers to each time. It loses context.
Sign languages have this problem even more critically because:
β Key Insight: Sign language is a discourse-level language β meaning is built across sentences, not just within them.
Before going further, understand this term:
| Term | Meaning |
|---|---|
| Sign Language | A full visual-spatial language (e.g., ASL) |
| Gloss | A written word-by-word representation of signs (e.g., MAN WALK STORE) |
| Text-to-Gloss Translation | Converting English text β ASL gloss notation |
Why gloss? It is an intermediate step before generating actual signed video. Getting the gloss right is foundational.
What it means: In ASL, when you introduce a person or object, you assign them a location in space (left, right, center). Every future reference to that entity must use the same spatial location.
Example:
DiscoSign's role: Track entities and maintain their spatial assignments across the entire discourse
What it means: ASL uses a specific grammatical structure called a pseudocleft or Question-Answer Clause to emphasize information.
English equivalent concept:
"What I want is coffee" (instead of just "I want coffee")
In ASL, this structure serves specific discourse functions β it signals focus, contrast, or topic introduction.
DiscoSign's role: Detect when QAC structures are appropriate and generate them correctly, rather than defaulting to simple sentence structures.
What it means: The same English concept should always map to the same ASL sign/gloss throughout a document.
Problem without this:
This inconsistency confuses Deaf readers, just like randomly switching synonyms confuses hearing readers.
DiscoSign's role: Maintain a stable mapping between English words and ASL glosses throughout the entire text.
English Text (full discourse)
β
Modular LLM Framework
βββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββ
β Module 1: Coreference β β Tracks spatial assignments
β Module 2: QAC Detection β β Identifies discourse structures
β Module 3: Gloss Mapping β β Ensures consistent vocabulary
βββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββ
β
ASL Gloss Translation
(discourse-coherent output)
Why modular? Each discourse phenomenon is complex. A modular design means:
Why LLM-based? Large Language Models have strong language understanding capabilities, making them suitable for:
These measure word overlap between generated and reference translations.
Problem: They evaluate one sentence at a time. They cannot detect:
Analogy: Grading each paragraph of an essay separately without checking if the argument is coherent overall.
DiscoSign introduces metrics that specifically measure:
| Metric Dimension | What It Checks |
|---|---|
| Spatial Consistency | Are entity locations maintained throughout? |
| QAC Accuracy | Are question-answer structures used correctly? |
| Concept-Gloss Stability | Is the same English word always the same gloss? |
What the experiments showed:
| Aspect | Result |
|---|---|
| Spatial consistency | Significantly improved vs. sentence-only translation |
| Entity tracking | Significantly improved |
| Single-sentence quality | Maintained competitive performance (no regression) |
β DiscoSign improves discourse-level quality without sacrificing sentence-level quality.
Why this matters:
DiscoSign is part of a larger research direction:
DiscoSign (this paper)
β Better gloss translation at discourse level
Bootstrapping Sign Language Annotations (2026)
β Solving the data scarcity problem with pseudo-annotation
Non-Manual Markers Research (2025)
β Adding facial expressions and body language to generation
Big Picture: The field is moving from simple sentence translation β full, natural, discourse-aware sign language generation that truly serves the DHH community.
| Concept | Key Takeaway |
|---|---|
| Problem | Sentence-level translation misses discourse coherence |
| Solution | DiscoSign: modular LLM framework for discourse-aware translation |
| Phenomenon 1 | Spatial coreference β consistent entity locations in space |
| Phenomenon 2 | QACs β pseudocleft structures for discourse functions |
| Phenomenon 3 | Concept-gloss consistency β stable vocabulary mapping |
| Evaluation | New metrics needed because BLEU-style metrics are insufficient |
| Result | First systematic discourse-level sign language translation framework |