The core question: How do we actually measure how people use AI for work?
Before this data release, researchers had limited tools to answer:
Key takeaway: Without structured data, these questions are impossible to answer rigorously.
OpenAI released what they call "OpenAI Signals" data.
| Feature | Detail |
|---|---|
| Coverage | 165 work activities |
| Countries | Nearly 100 |
| Time period | Q1 2025 → Q3 2026 |
| Format | Quarterly data |
| Source | Individual ChatGPT plans only |
⚠️ Important exclusion: Enterprise messages and Codex use are not included. This matters when interpreting results.
To make sense of the data, OpenAI used a standardized system called Intermediate Work Activities (IWAs).
Using a common framework allows researchers to:
🧠 Think of it this way: IWAs are like a universal language for describing work — they let you compare a teacher's tasks with a marketer's tasks on the same scale.
The finding:
Across 74 countries, the top 10 activities dropped from 56.0% of work messages in Q1 2025 to 51.1% in Q3 2026.
Q1 2025: [████████████████████░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░] 56% → Top 10 activities dominate
Q3 2026: [██████████████████░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░] 51% → More spread across activities
When researchers compared ChatGPT work usage to actual U.S. job activities, they found substantial differences.
Approximately 43% of U.S. employment-weighted tasks fall into categories like:
These are physical or highly regulated tasks that people do NOT bring to ChatGPT — and they were excluded from the reported categories.
ChatGPT usage data reflects what people choose to use AI for, not a mirror of the entire economy. Physical and hands-on work remains largely outside AI chat tools.
The dataset enables several research directions:
| Research Question | How the Data Helps |
|---|---|
| Does AI use differ by country? | Compare IWA distributions across ~100 countries |
| Is AI replacing certain jobs? | Match ChatGPT usage to employment data |
| How is AI adoption changing? | Track quarterly trends over 6 quarters |
| What work is AI NOT used for? | Compare to O*NET full task distribution |
A critical component of this research is user privacy. OpenAI uses several safeguards:
🔐 This is an example of privacy-preserving research design — balancing scientific value with ethical responsibility.
PROBLEM: How do we measure AI's role in work?
↓
SOLUTION: Connect ChatGPT usage → IWA framework (O*NET)
↓
DATA: 165 activities, ~100 countries, Q1 2025–Q3 2026
↓
FINDINGS: • AI work use is diversifying over time
• Countries specialize differently
• ChatGPT ≠ full picture of economy (physical work excluded)
↓
PURPOSE: Enable researchers to study AI + labor economics rigorously